‘Being Gordon Ramsay’ (2026) Netflix Series Review - A Candid Look Behind the Persona

The series follows celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay as he balances family life and personal history while racing to launch five ambitious dining concepts inside London’s 22 Bishopsgate skyscraper.

TV Shows Reviews

I went into Being Gordon Ramsay expecting another polished celebrity documentary, and for the most part, that’s exactly what it is, but it also offers enough insight into Gordon’s daily life to make the experience worthwhile. Across six episodes, the show tracks Ramsay through one of the biggest professional gambles of his career: opening multiple restaurants simultaneously in one of London’s most high-profile buildings while managing his role as a husband and father of six. It mixes boardroom stress, kitchen logistics, and surprisingly intimate family moments, creating a portrait that feels calmer and more reflective than the high-volume persona viewers usually associate with him.


The most compelling thread is the sheer scale of the Bishopsgate project. We see early planning sessions, construction walkthroughs, menu testing, and tense meetings in which Ramsay openly worries about reputation and financial risk. There’s a sense of controlled urgency that runs through the season, though it rarely explodes into the kind of dramatic confrontations fans might expect. Instead, the tension sits beneath the surface. The series frames Ramsay less as a fiery TV judge and more as a strategist trying to manage an enormous brand while maintaining a sense of identity. As someone who watches a lot of culinary programming, I appreciated how the show treats restaurant development as an ecosystem; design decisions, staffing, marketing, and even influencer dinners all become part of the narrative.


What surprised me most was how much time the camera spends with his family. Tana Ramsay appears frequently, grounding the story with a practical, sometimes teasing perspective on Gordon’s relentless work ethic. His children, especially Tilly and Holly, offer glimpses of a softer dynamic that contrasts with the persona audiences know from competition shows. The series also dives into Gordon’s difficult childhood, and these reflections give context to his perfectionism. Hearing him discuss poverty, instability, and the drive to build something lasting reframes the pressure he puts on himself and others. These personal moments don’t feel overly sentimental; they come across as attempts to explain the man behind the brand.


Visually, the show leans toward clean, contemporary documentary aesthetics. Wide shots of London’s skyline and the glass structure of 22 Bishopsgate give the series a sleek corporate energy, while handheld footage at home provides contrast. The editing is smooth and easy to follow, and the pacing favors observation over spectacle. I found the cinematography especially effective when it lingered on the chaos of a half-finished kitchen or a quiet family dinner, allowing the audience to sit with the stakes rather than rushing to the next dramatic beat.


Ramsay himself is an engaging presence even when he isn’t shouting. He oscillates between confident executive and anxious founder, and those transitions give the show emotional texture. There are moments where he jokes with his kids or quietly questions whether the project is worth the strain, and these scenes land because they feel unguarded. The supporting cast — chefs, investors, and family members — adds variety without overshadowing him, and the conversations about food are accessible even if you’re not deeply immersed in culinary culture.


That said, the series sometimes feels too comfortable with its subject. While it promises an unfiltered look at Ramsay’s life, the narrative rarely pushes into uncomfortable territory. Conflicts appear briefly and then fade before they can reshape the story, which makes the overall arc feel less urgent than it could have been. Even potentially dramatic moments, like tensions within the extended family or setbacks during the launch timeline, are handled gently. As a result, parts of the show resemble a long promotional feature rather than a probing documentary.


The pacing also slows noticeably in the middle episodes. There’s a stretch where planning meetings and brand discussions start to blur together, and the storytelling becomes repetitive. I found myself wanting more focus on the kitchen teams or a deeper exploration of the chefs who will ultimately run these spaces. The emotional stakes are clear, but the narrative sometimes circles the same themes without offering new insights. Viewers expecting a high-pressure culinary series might find the tone almost too relaxed.


Still, the charm lies in how ordinary much of the experience feels. Instead of presenting Ramsay as an untouchable icon, the show frames him as someone juggling logistics, family expectations, and personal doubts. The quieter moments — a casual conversation at home, a tired laugh after a long meeting, or a reflective monologue about legacy — reveal a dimension that many of his competitive shows don’t explore. I appreciated how the direction allowed these scenes to breathe without forcing artificial drama.


By the time the series reaches its final stretch, the opening of the restaurants becomes less about triumph and more about endurance. Watching Ramsay move through the finished spaces carries a sense of relief rather than celebration, and that restrained emotional payoff suits the overall tone. The show never pretends that success is guaranteed; instead, it highlights the constant balancing act between ambition and personal life.


In the end, Being Gordon Ramsay works best as a character study rather than a suspenseful docuseries. It offers a polished, sometimes overly safe portrait of a chef trying to reconcile the pressures of global fame with the realities of family and aging in a high-stress industry. I enjoyed seeing a calmer side of him and appreciated the emphasis on process over spectacle, even if I occasionally wished the storytelling dug deeper or took more risks. It may not redefine the culinary documentary format. Still, it succeeds in presenting Ramsay as a multidimensional figure — driven, flawed, and surprisingly reflective — and that perspective kept me engaged long after the initial novelty wore off.


Final Score- [7.5/10]
Reviewed by - Anjali Sharma
Follow @AnjaliS54769166 on Twitter
Publisher at Midgard Times


Read at MOVIESR.net:‘Being Gordon Ramsay’ (2026) Netflix Series Review - A Candid Look Behind the Persona


Related Posts