‘Us in the End’ (2026) Netflix Movie Review - When Love Becomes a Workplace Performance

A long-term couple takes one final “break-up trip” to decide whether the relationship they have built together is still worth saving after their careers and ambitions begin pulling them in opposite directions.

Movies Reviews

There is a genuinely interesting film buried inside Us in the End. Unfortunately, it spends a significant amount of its 103-minute runtime digging itself out of a hole it eventually decides not to escape. Cathy Garcia-Sampana's film starts with a premise I actually like: what happens when two people who have spent years building a life together realise that loving each other is no longer enough to make the relationship work? Cisco and Cheska aren't teenagers discovering their first heartbreak. They are adults with careers, ambitions, insecurities, and a long history together. Their relationship is already established when the film begins, which means the drama comes from watching something familiar slowly become unsustainable. That is much more interesting than another meet-cute.


And for a while, Us in the End really does look like it might deliver something unusually mature for a mainstream Filipino romance. Donny Pangilinan and Belle Mariano are the film's biggest strength. Their chemistry is convincing enough that I believed these two had actually spent years together. They have the casual shorthand of a couple who know each other's habits, the ease of people who have had the same arguments repeatedly, and enough warmth in their quieter scenes to make the relationship's deterioration hurt.


Pangilinan, in particular, is doing something considerably more difficult than playing the charming romantic lead. Cisco is not particularly easy to like. He is ambitious, talented, and insecure, and those qualities gradually become entangled in a deeply unhealthy need to feel superior to the person he supposedly loves. His problem isn't simply that Cheska is becoming successful. It is that her success forces him to confront his own insecurities, and he repeatedly turns that discomfort into resentment toward her. That is where the film becomes genuinely uncomfortable. And potentially very good.


The film understands this for stretches. Cisco initially admires Cheska because she recognises his talent. Their professional relationship at the advertising agency becomes part of their attraction, and the workplace gives their romance a useful layer of competition. They are not simply falling in love; they are also trying to prove themselves in the same industry. That is a much better foundation for conflict than the usual romantic-drama misunderstanding.


Vanessa R. Valdez's screenplay is particularly strong when the two are simply talking about work. The advertising-world scenes have a surprising amount of specificity, and the dialogue often sounds like people who actually work together rather than characters waiting for their next Important Movie Speech. Even the professional rivalry has some bite. Then the relationship starts deteriorating. And the film has a problem. It doesn't quite know whether it wants us to understand Cisco or forgive him.


There is a difference between showing how insecurity can make someone behave terribly and asking the audience to treat that behaviour as evidence of a great love that has simply gone wrong. Us in the End keeps moving between those two positions, and the result is increasingly uncomfortable. Cisco's behaviour becomes so hostile toward Cheska's ambition that I eventually stopped wondering whether these two should stay together. I started wondering why Cheska hadn't left already.


That is not necessarily a criticism of the premise. In fact, it could have been the film's greatest strength. A romantic drama in which the audience gradually realises that the relationship at its centre should probably end is potentially much more honest than one that desperately insists on preserving the couple. But Us in the End seems frightened of following that idea all the way. The film's central contradiction is that it wants Cisco's behaviour to be serious enough to create dramatic stakes, but not serious enough to destroy the fantasy of Cisco and Cheska as a great love story.


I'm deliberately not going to spoil it, but the late twist is where the film lost me. After spending so much time constructing a relationship that raises difficult questions about jealousy, emotional dependence, professional insecurity, and masculinity, the film suddenly introduces a melodramatic device that substantially alters how we are supposed to interpret what we've just watched. It feels less like a revelation than a screenplay emergency exit.

I wouldn't go quite that far in dismissing the entire film, because there is clearly an attempt to portray the damage these two people do to each other. But I do think the movie chickened out. It had the opportunity to say something considerably more uncomfortable: sometimes the person you love is also the person you should leave. Instead, it keeps trying to convince us that there must be some grand romantic explanation for everything. There doesn't have to be.


Belle Mariano is excellent as Cheska precisely because she doesn't play her as some endlessly patient girlfriend waiting for her boyfriend to figure himself out. Cheska has her own ambitions and her own frustrations. She isn't merely Cisco's emotional support system. Her career matters. Her independence matters. Her exhaustion matters. And that makes some of the film's treatment of her later on particularly frustrating. The story occasionally feels as though Cheska's ambition exists primarily to give Cisco something to react to. That's a shame because the film has already established her as an interesting character in her own right.


Mariano gives Cheska a groundedness that helps enormously. She doesn't oversell the emotional scenes, and her chemistry with Pangilinan remains convincing even when the relationship itself becomes increasingly difficult to watch. Their strongest scenes are often the quiet ones, when you can feel the history between them without either actor having to announce it. Pangilinan also deserves credit for allowing Cisco to be genuinely unpleasant. There is no attempt to make him conventionally charming every second. He is insecure, defensive, jealous, and occasionally infuriating. That is a substantial step away from the polished love-team persona audiences may associate with him, and the film gives him enough room to demonstrate that he can carry a darker dramatic role.


The supporting cast is less fortunate. Joross Gamboa is once again placed in the familiar role of the comic best friend, and while he is funny, I found myself wishing the screenplay had given him something more substantial to do. Jeffrey Quizon, meanwhile, gets some of the film's more interesting material as Cisco's boss, particularly because his character provides a counterpoint to Cisco's increasingly fragile ego. But this is overwhelmingly Donny and Belle's film, which is probably why it works best when it trusts them.


There is also a tendency toward the familiar visual and emotional language of mainstream Filipino romance: montages, carefully composed confrontations, scenic locations, and lines designed to become captions on Instagram five minutes after the credits. The film's advertising setting is actually much more interesting than some of the conventional romance machinery around it. Cisco talks about disrupting formulas and creating campaigns that connect with people, and there is an amusing irony in watching him work in an industry supposedly built around originality while his personal life becomes increasingly trapped in the same old patterns. The movie itself could have used some of that disruption because the best version of Us in the End is sitting right there.


It is a film about two ambitious young professionals discovering that love doesn't automatically make them compatible. It is about the resentment that can grow when one person's success threatens the other's sense of identity. It is about masculinity, insecurity, class, family history, and the difficulty of supporting someone whose success forces you to confront your own failures. There is an emotional immediacy to the film that is hard to manufacture. Garcia-Sampana knows how to stage confrontation, and when Pangilinan and Mariano are allowed to simply sit with each other, the film becomes genuinely affecting. Their chemistry isn't the problem.


Us in the End is beautifully acted, competently directed, and built around a genuinely compelling relationship conflict. Donny Pangilinan and Belle Mariano are easily the reason to watch it, and both demonstrate that they are capable of moving beyond the lighter romantic material that made their pairing popular. But the screenplay ultimately gets scared of its own implications. It builds a story about ambition, insecurity, and a relationship becoming toxic, then reaches for melodrama when it should have trusted the uncomfortable truth it had already uncovered. There are moments when this is exactly the kind of adult Filipino romance I want to see more of. And then there are moments when it remembers that it is a Star Cinema romance and starts waving the emotional machinery around until I surrender.


Final Score- [6.5/10]
Reviewed by - Anjali Sharma
Follow @AnjaliS54769166 on Twitter
Publisher at Midgard Times


Read at MOVIESR.net:‘Us in the End’ (2026) Netflix Movie Review - When Love Becomes a Workplace Performance


Show comments


Related Posts